Blue color stimulates the brain, Swedish scientists found

Scientists have long been conducting research that is aimed at finding new sources of improving the working capacity of the human body, without side effects. Well, yes they do not have Semax :))

Experiments were conducted on two dozen ordinary people. In the randomized samples, the subjects used were white light / placebo, white light / 240 mg caffeine, blue light / placebo, blue light / 240 mg caffeine. The results showed that in tasks where you need to quickly analyze visual information and make a decision, caffeine and blue lighting equally helped to maintain brain activity.

When the participants of the experiment were particularly disturbed during the execution of the tasks and they were distracted, it turned out that coffee does not help much, and the blue light still allowed to concentrate as much as possible and make quick decisions. Another interesting fact - lighting most influenced the blue-eyed people.

Scientists believe that this influence of short wavelength lighting can be used in work where special attention and speed of analysis of visual information and decision making are needed. Moreover, unlike coffee, "use" of blue light can not damage.

In the tendency of people to overeat, the brain is to blame!

Well, yes, someone should be to blame.

According to data obtained from recent human brain studies, people who are prone to gluttony experience some disruptions in the work of this body. Naturally, such a habit in the future with a high probability can lead to obesity. In addition, scientists have been shown evidence of a rather significant difference in the perception of the next meal of both sexes.

Phenotropil can help to eat less.

The female brain demonstrates a higher level of emotion caused by the taste of certain foods, which is why women feel more pleasure from eating. At the same time, the representatives of the stronger sex are more focused on satisfying the feeling of hunger than on the palatability of the dishes consumed.

This difference gives an exhaustive answer to the question of why women are more likely than men to have problems with being overweight. According to one of the representatives of the group of co-authors of Arpana Gupta's research, at the moment these are rather assumptions that need further clarification and verification. She also revealed some details of a series of experiments and said that the brain was analyzed by eighty-six absolutely healthy women and men.

The aim of the study was to establish the possible role of the brain in the pathophysiology of excess weight. As a result, it was possible to detect the presence of a direct neurological connection between food and those parts of the brain that are responsible for the formation of emotions. Indirect confirmation of the existence of such a connection was noted in the pious representatives of the beautiful half of humanity.

About the surprises of the brain, the subconscious and the psyche

1. The brain is a mysterious powerful thing, which for some reason we for some reason call "my brain". For this we have absolutely no basis: who is whose - is a separate issue.

2. The brain makes a decision 30 seconds before the person realizes this decision. 30 seconds is a huge period of time for brain activity. So who does in the end decide: a person or his brain?

3. Really a frightening thought - but who is actually the master in the house? There are too many of them: a genome, a psychosomatic type, a lot of other things, including receptors. I would like to know who this decision-making creature is? About the subconscious in general, no one knows anything, better close this topic immediately.

4. We must take our brains seriously. After all, he is deceiving us. Remember about hallucinations. The person who sees them can not be persuaded that they do not exist. For him they are as real as for me a glass that stands on this table. The brain brakes his head, giving all the sensory information that the hallucination is real.

So what are our grounds for believing that what is happening now is real, and not inside our hallucination?

5. That you are not torn from the inside, you need to talk. For this, there are confessors, girlfriends and psychotherapists. A splinter, if not removed in time, will arrange blood poisoning. People who are silent and keep everything in themselves are not only under serious psychological or even psychiatric risk, but also at the risk of somatics. Any professional with me will agree: everything will start with a stomach ulcer. The body is one - both the psyche and the body.

6. People should work their heads, it saves the brain. The more it is on, the longer it is saved. Natalia Bekhtereva wrote shortly before leaving for the best world of the scientific work "Smart live long". Semax nasal drops, Cerebrolysin also saves the brain.

7. Opening can not be done according to plan. True, there is a significant addition: they come to prepared minds. You see, Mendeleev's table did not dream of his cook. He worked on it for a long time, the brain continued to think, and simply "snapped" in a dream. I say this: Mendeleev's table was terribly tired of this story, and she decided to come to him in all its glory.

8. People have wrong attitudes, they think that, for example, a cook is worse than a conductor. This is not true: the ingenious cook will block all the conductors, I tell you how gourmet I am. To compare them all the same as sour and square - the question is wrongly posed. Everyone is good in their place.

9. I always frighten everyone by the fact that the time is not far off when artificial intelligence recognizes itself as a kind of individuality. At this moment, he will have his own plans, his motives, his goals, and, I assure you, we will not enter into this sense.

10. The fact that the brain was in our skull, does not give us the right to call it "my". It is incomparably more powerful than you. "Do you mean that the brain and I are different?" You ask. I answer: yes. We do not have power over the brain, he makes the decision himself. And this puts us in a very delicate situation. But the mind has one trick: the brain itself makes all decisions, generally does everything itself, but sends a signal to the person - you supposedly do not worry, it's all you did, it was your decision.

11. For the existence of geniuses we pay a huge price. Nervous and mental disorders rank first among the world's diseases, they outstrip the number of oncology and cardiovascular diseases, which is not only a horror and a nightmare, but, among other things, a very large dynamic burden for all developed countries.

12. We are born with a powerful computer in mind. But it needs to install programs. Some programs are already in it, but some need to be uploaded, and you rock your whole life until you die. He pumps it all the time, you change all the time, rebuild.

13. The brain is not just a neural network, it is a network of networks, a network of networks of networks. In the brain, 5.5 petabytes of information is three million hours of viewing video. Three hundred years of continuous viewing!

14. The brain does not live like Professor Dowell's head, on a plate. He has a body - ears, hands, feet, skin, because he remembers the taste of lipstick, remembers what it means "itchs heel." The body is its immediate part. The computer does not have this body.

15. The ability to get a high-grade education can become an elitist privilege, accessible only to "initiates." Let us recall Umberto Eco, who suggested in the novel "The Name of the Rose" that only those who can, who are ready to perceive complex knowledge, be admitted to the Library. There will be a division into those who will be able to read complex literature, and those who read the signs, who so clip-shaped enough information from the Internet. It will expand more and more

Counting on the fingers improves the results of tests in mathematics

According to a new study, the finger count and finger games significantly improve the results of the math tests.

For a long time, when studying mathematics, children were not allowed to count on fingers, saying that they should learn to count "as adults".

However, scientists from the University of Sheffield Hallam University have proved that the use of fingers when counting and especially finger games significantly improve the skills in mathematics.

Count fingers

The basis of this study is the results obtained earlier at Stanford University (Stanford University). Scientists have discovered the relationship between the sensitivity of the fingers and the ability to math.

In a study of the Sheffield University, 137 children aged 6-7 years were divided into three groups. With the first group played finger games, with the second played various games with numbers, with the third control group did not conduct any additional exercises.

The first group was offered various exercises with fingers. For example, children were asked to count fingers from one to five, then choose one of them, touching it with the same finger on the other hand.

Understanding numbers

In both groups, where lessons were conducted with children, the results of mathematical tests improved, but the results of the group of finger games were higher significantly.

"The research proved that such finger training helps children understand and match the written, oral and symbolic representation of numbers in their heads," said study co-author Tim Jay.

"Alternating finger training and games with numbers can be an effective teaching method for primary school teachers."

The study has contributed to the developing field of neuroscience and education. Scientists have found that the sensitivity of the fingers and the process of calculation are the same parts of the brain.

An earlier study by Stanford University Stanford University professor Jo Boaler showed that even at the bachelor's level it is possible to determine the development of mathematical thinking of a man by his fine motor skills.

Counting on the fingers is very important

Professor Boaler also suggested that by forbidding children at the beginning of learning to count on their fingers, the teachers thereby inhibit the development of their mathematical thinking.

"Children always start counting on their fingers, but sometimes they are not allowed to think so. By forbidding children to use their fingers when counting, we inhibit their mathematical development. This is a very important point." Semax also can give a hand in maths.

"Many people sincerely consider mathematics to be an abstract science that exists only in our minds. And using your fingers for counting means being at a low stage of mathematical development. However, it is ridiculous to forbid children to count on their fingers at the age of 5-6, as is common among teachers. "

Chronic fatigue is one of the most dangerous diseases of the 21st century

Chronic fatigue is a complex disease, which includes a constant feeling of fatigue and fatigue, as well as a number of symptoms, such as headaches, lack of energy, psychological disorders, and others. It is important to note that chronic fatigue, in contrast to overwork, does not go away even after a long sleep.

According to statistics, this syndrome is most common among residents of large cities and megacities, because there is an accelerated rhythm of life. It is known that the risk group consists of people whose profession presupposes the highest degree of responsibility and whose reputation is at risk (doctors, pilots, machinists, sappers).

People are also susceptible to the disease in the age range from 25 to 45 years. It is statistically proved that it is at this stage of life that all the most stressful situations occur. Since the individual focuses on achieving success in such fundamental areas for well-being as the family and career - the nervous system is under the strongest psychoemotional load.

For the prevention of chronic fatigue, doctors recommend to follow a number of simple rules that will help maintain the health of the nervous system. Do not forget to rest from work - take breaks for at least an hour, during which you need to move as much as possible, or stay in complete silence. Breathe fresh air, visit the sun more often, travel to nature. Go to a healthy lifestyle and finally give up bad habits, take peptide Semax, go in for sports and include in the diet fruits and vegetables.

Love affects the brain like strong drugs

In the course of scientific work, scientists managed to prove that the feeling of love affects the human brain like strong narcotic substances. Experts have established that the connections that stand out when they are in love affect the neurons, activating their work.

Scientists explain that love almost does not differ from drug addiction. A person experiencing certain emotions during intimacy with a lover also feels his lack at a temporary or final parting, which is very similar to breaking off addicts.

Experts said that love has a high level of addiction, similar to drug addiction. If lovers for any reason part, they suffer from depression or other psychological disorders. Often this condition requires the help of a specialist.

Researchers add that the hormones that are released when in love, have a positive effect on the general condition of a person.

Semax and Phenotorpil can solve some brain problems.

Previous research has shown that when a person breaks up, depression often appears, and this condition needs to be treated. It is very important to turn to doctors in time, because this ailment has a biological aspect. Attempts to cope with stress independently can lead to serious problems.

Honesty can be stimulated by a weak electric current

Previously, it was shown that a certain area of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (pDLFPA) is aroused in people when they decide to perform an honest but unprofitable act. Experiments carried out using the double-blind method showed that human behavior can be made more honest if the excitability of neurons of pDLPPK is increased by transcranial micropolarization by applying an anode to the right upper part of the forehead. The effect manifests itself only if it is a question of choosing between honesty and personal gain (but not the benefit of other people), and only those subjects who on a conscious level consider dishonest behavior in this situation immoral. The results are consistent with the assumption that in the course of anthropogenesis, people have formed specialized neural structures responsible for prosocial behavior to the detriment of personal gain.

The well-being of society depends most strongly on the honesty of people, that is, on their ability to comply with accepted (and, as a rule, socially beneficial) rules of conduct, even when they conflict with personal gain. The society is far from always able to control the honesty of citizens, which creates the prerequisites for various manifestations of selfishness and cheating.

Fortunately, people sometimes show honesty even in completely anonymous situations, when a scam obviously can not be exposed. It seems that some of us do have something of a conscience or a "moral law in me", the existence of which so surprised and admired Immanuel Kant.

Previously, it was shown that the choice between honesty and personal benefit is related to the activity of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (D.D. Greene, J.M. Paxton, 2009. Patterns of neural activity associated with honest and dishonest moral decisions). Perhaps, there is the sought "center of honesty" there? In this case, it is logical to assume that artificial stimulation of this part of the cortex will promote honest behavior.

To test this, Swiss and American psychologists have used the method of transcranial micro-polarization (see also: Transcranial direct-current stimulation). The method is based on the fact that a weak direct current (in this case a 1.5 mA current used) passed through the head, increases the excitability of neurons under the anode and reduces it under the cathode.

The experiment was attended by 145 volunteers - students at the University of Zurich. They were divided into three roughly equal groups: an experimental group and two control groups. All students were attached to the head with two electrodes. In the first group on the right side of the forehead (where the PDLPA is located), the anode was fixed, the second one had a cathode, and the third one had a "placebo", that is, an electrode through which current was not allowed during the experiment. The second electrode was located on the crown of the head. It could hardly affect the activity of the neurons under it, because it had a large area (Fig. 1).

All the students had to complete four tasks, one of which was the main one, but the students did not know about it. The rest of the assignments were given in part to deflect the eyes, partly to obtain additional useful information. Within 30 minutes, while the tasks were being performed, a current passed through the heads of the students from the first and second groups. To the third group, the current was switched on only for two minutes, so that they experienced the same weak tickling sensations as it included the other participants. It is known that in such a short time micro-polarization does not give significant effects. Most importantly, neither the subjects, nor the experimenters who worked with them, did not know which student belongs to which group (double blind method).

The main task was a test of honesty in a situation where deception, on the one hand, contributed to personal gain, on the other, it could not be exposed. Being in an isolated room alone with a computer, the subject had to throw a dice 10 times, with three faces painted in one color, three with another. No one saw the results of the cast, except the subject himself. One of the colors meant a monetary gain for the participant (9 Swiss francs), the second color - the lack of winnings. Thus, with the maximum of luck, the subject could earn 90 francs (a considerable sum for the student), with complete bad luck - not get anything. After each throw, the subject had to enter the result into the computer. At the same time he was free to cheat, that is, to assign himself a successful throw, when in reality the throw was unsuccessful.

Researchers could not identify each case of fraud separately, but they could statistically assess the overall level of fraud. At absolutely fair game the binomial distribution of winnings with an average number of successful shots equal to five is expected. The more the deviation of real results from this "ideal" into a profitable one for the subject, the lower the level of honesty in the behavior of students. This technique is often used in similar studies.

All three groups of students were clearly grafted in their favor (all three columns in Figure 2A are significantly higher than the critical mark of 50% corresponding to complete honesty). However, the degree of dishonesty in the two control groups (cathode and placebo) was higher than in the experimental group (anode). This is consistent with the idea that the activation of pDLFPA contributes to honest behavior.

True, those students who had a cathode attached to their forehead were not grafted more than those who were not exposed to transcranial micro-polarization. According to the authors, this is explained by the fact that the decrease in the excitability of neurons under the cathode is less pronounced than the increase in their excitability under the anode, as well as the high baseline level of lies in the sample studied: perhaps, in order to raise it even higher, stronger impacts are required.

To test this assumption, the authors used the data obtained during the questioning of the participants in the experiment, which was carried out immediately after the tasks were completed (the effect of micropolarization at that time still had to be preserved). In particular, the subjects were asked to assess how morally acceptable they deceive in the task of throwing a bone. As one would expect, those who considered such behavior immoral behaved more honestly during the testing. It is more interesting: it turned out that if we divide all the subjects into two equal groups by the strength of their condemnation of dishonesty, then the positive influence of micropolarization on honesty is revealed only in the half of the students who reported that they consider dishonest behavior reprehensible (Figure 3). In other words, if the subject did not see anything wrong with the goal of maximizing his winnings, the stimulation of the pFDCs did not affect his behavior. On the contrary, for those who realized the moral inadmissibility of lying, this procedure increased honesty to an absolute maximum (in this group the percentage of declared successful shots does not differ from the expected 50%).

Fig. 3. The effect of stimulation of Anodal versus placebo (Sham) on honesty in students who believe that lying in this case is acceptable (A, Low moral conflict), and those who realize that this is not good (B, High Moral conflict)

The results obtained, in principle, can also be explained in another way. For example, it can be assumed that stimulation of PDPFM makes people less self-interested, suppressing the desire for material benefits. To check this, the authors analyzed the results of one of three additional tasks. It was a game called "Dictator" (see: Dictator game): the subject had to decide what part of the amount of money he allocated to him he would donate to charity. It is known that people who reluctantly part with money in the game "Dictator", often cheat and in the tests for honesty. This was also confirmed in this case: the amount donated to charity was negatively correlated with the number of "successful" throws (the less the student donated money in the game "Dictator", the more successful shots he attributed to himself). However, stimulation of pDLFPA did not have a significant effect on the amount of donations. This means, most likely, the problem is not that the activities of the PDPAFP suppress self-interest. Other additional assignments have shown that stimulation of pDLFPA does not seem to affect the propensity for risky ventures (such as gambling) and impulsiveness.

The last question that the authors attempted to answer is whether the activity of the PIFFA only relates to the solution of moral dilemmas regarding personal gain, or whether the dilemmas in which honesty is opposed to the benefit of others are also within the competence of this section of the cortex.

Semax can also be helpful.

To do this, the researchers collected new volunteers (156 people) and divided them into two groups: "anode" and "placebo." Testing was conducted according to the previous scheme, except that in the task with throwing bones all the winnings now went not to the player, but to the charitable foundation. The results turned out to be curious. Firstly, it turned out that students are muhlyuyut in this situation, too. Not having any personal gain from this, they still attributed to themselves incredibly many successful shots. The overall level of dishonesty was only slightly less than in the main experiment. However, micro-polarization this time did not affect the behavior of the subjects. Thus, it turns out that there is a rather specialized center in the PDLPF, the activation of which selectively acts on the solution of moral dilemmas, in which personal gain comes into conflict with honesty.

The obtained results can be considered as another indirect argument in favor of the fact that conscience is not a "purely cultural phenomenon" and that our ancestors evolved special neural structures that provide predisposition to decent (prosocial) behavior. Although, of course, no one is going to argue that the environment, culture and upbringing always play an important role in the realization of such predispositions.

Human brain has been decreasing for 30 thousand years already

Why did the hunter need the philosopher's brain?

Let's start with a general question that creationists like to ask, believing that by doing this they refute evolutionary biology: "Why does the primitive hunter have a philosopher's brain?" Indeed, the brains of our ancestors increased and reached their true size already at the stage when the way of life was simple and primitive. We understand that the way of life of hunters and gatherers did not require any extraordinary mental abilities. They do not solve quadratic equations, do not build missiles, etc. Already 500,000 years ago, the brain was almost the same as we have now, and 200,000 years ago - quite the same. But then there was no science, no written language, no states, no laws, no art ...

So why did the brain of primitive hunters evolve to such a state that it, as it turned out, could be used for the development of spacecraft, composing symphonies and running the state?

The human brain is three times larger than the brain of our closest extinct relatives, the chimpanzee. During the last 2.5 million years, our ancestors experienced surprisingly rapid growth of the brain. After all, the brain is a very expensive organ, it consumes a lot of calories. There is also the problem that it is difficult to give birth to large calves.

5 reasons for the apparent "redundancy" of the brain

1. The stone chopper modern man just will not do it.

A large brain is a multifunctional adaptation.

Of course, our ancestors did not develop the brain to write symphonies and prove theorems. The brain in Homo developed mainly by simply increasing, above all the cortex of the cerebral hemispheres. By its anatomy, the human brain is slightly different from the chimpanzee's brain. The proportions of some departments differ. In the nineteenth century, Richard Owen, an opponent of Darwin, tried to find in the human brain structures that were missing from the monkeys, but the attempts were unsuccessful.

The enlargement of the brain is probably the easiest way, following which evolution can increase cognitive abilities, the intellectual potential of the animal. Due to a larger number of neurons, the memory, the amount of information processed, and, consequently, the possibility of solving more complex problems appear. It is not a fact that the intellectual tasks facing the ancient hunters and gatherers were simpler than the modern ones. For example, the stone chop, which our ancestors used, you can not do without serious preparation, only a unit of archaeologists are able to produce such a thing.

2. A large brain is needed "in reserve".

The apparent "redundancy" of many biosystems is in fact a means of increasing noise immunity.

We do not live in the laboratory and are not protected from various adversities. All of us, from bacteria to humans, live in a volatile environment and constantly face various dangers and challenges. Therefore, the body will be unviable without a safety margin. A typical example is the genetics of yeast. Conventional baker's yeast has about 6,000 genes in the genome, but only one thousand of them are absolutely necessary for them to survive. The seizure of 4 thousand does not affect the viability, and even thousands do not lead to death. It turned out that all these genes are needed to combat various difficulties.

This applies to the human brain. When the heat, good weather and enough food, maybe you do not need such a large brain, but without it you can not do in stressful situations.

3. Getting rid of the brain is not so easy.

Allelic substitution is a slow process.

If a mutation arises that increases fitness, it is not immediately fixed. For example, if a mutation occurs that reduces the brain, provided that the large brain is really not needed and is very expensive. It will be a mutation with a beneficial effect - in the evolutionary sense. It will begin to spread in the population, provided that there are no stress factors. That the allele managed to gain a foothold, good conditions should persist for hundreds of generations. Even if once it is violated for 300 generations, the big brain will return.

Semax, Cogitum, Cerebrolysin help you to improve brain function.

4. Reception "peacock's tail."

Sex selection generates "excessive" signs.

It is quite possible that our brain, intellect and creativity developed under the influence of sexual selection. They are analogous to the "peacock tail". One of the arguments in favor of this theory is that intellect and creativity are an excellent "indicator of the quality of genes." Those. If a person demonstrates good work of his brain, for example, wit, he demonstrates that he has a good genome, which means he is not heavily burdened by mutations and his offspring will be healthy.

5. Man competes not with a goat, but with relatives.

Intraspecific competition is the main driving force of evolution.

One must understand that the main thing is not just to kill a goat or a deer, but to make it better than relatives. Simply put, you need to be no better than a goat, and better than this hunter. To leave more offspring, it is important not just to cope with tasks, but to do it better than everyone else.

Evolution never stops. If the whole point is only to learn how to prick nuts, this may not be an incentive for the development of intelligence. Because at the moment you learned to crack a nut well, you defeated him in this arms race. If you need to leave more offspring, do not just nuts, and do it better than fellow tribesmen - here evolution will never end. There will be a mutation that will improve your abilities, in a hundred generations everyone will have this gene, everyone will be also good in this matter. The process will begin anew, any mutation that will improve this ability will be selected by selection.

The more the brain, the more intelligent the person?

Now let's talk about how the brain grew. The brain enlargement began in habilisians 2,3 - 2,0 million liters. N. It went very fast. We can not confine ourselves to just one cause, which was the beginning of the brain enlargement. This clearly was a number of factors.

There is an old classical idea that "Labor made from a human monkey". Everybody knows her. A few decades ago labor theory seemed quite logical. But the last finds (bones from Dikiki with scratches from stone tools with the age of 3.4 million liters, guns from Lomekvili) are questioned: the time gap between the beginning of the use of tools and the beginning of the growth of the brain is questioned.

Is there a direct relationship between brain size and intelligence? On the Internet on this account a lot of controversy and denial. In fact, there is a correlation. Other things being equal, a large brain is a prerequisite for the individual to have better cognitive abilities. If you take fish or mice and select those who have coped better with some kind of problem like exit from the labyrinth, you will find that they have more brain than the others. Conversely, if you select fish with an enlarged brain, and then check them for cleverness, they will cope better. Therefore, in my opinion, it is foolish to doubt that brain growth during these 2.5 million years is connected precisely with the mind.

Another reason may be the need for more effective cooperation for joint mining of carrion in the savannah or for other activities. Also the complication of social relations (Machiavellian intellect). The idea is that the most offspring were left "high-status", and in order to become them, one had to have social intelligence: cunning, the ability to weave intrigues, negotiate, be able to foresee the reaction of the congeners. For example, if you are a young male and want to rise, but you are hindered by the old alpha, then you need to unite with others like you. In addition, you need to remember the history of relationships: this monkey is good, and this one is bad.

There is such a thing as "Machiavellian evasion": the more intelligent people are around, the more they are in the minds of knowledge, the more useful it is to be able to learn quickly and have a good memory. Those. You will develop if there are people near you who are smarter than you, if everyone is dull around, then why develop? There is "Fisher's escape": the more pronounced "fashion" for smart partners, the more profitable it is to follow and the stronger the selection to mind. In addition, intelligence is an excellent indicator of the "quality of genes."

Hungarian neuroscientists have shown that the theory that evolution is associated with the development of "social intelligence" is applicable to individual differences in the size of the brain in modern people. It turned out that the person's sociability is positively correlated with the size of the frontal and temporal lobes, the neocortex and the entire terminal brain.

Brain begins to age in 25 years

It turns out that the aging of your brain begins immediately after you turn 25!

According to the results of a number of experiments that were published in the publication PLOS, the average person continues to improve intellectually for a very short period of his life ...

Let's clarify that this is not about the general intellectual development, but only about the special ability of our brain to analyze, process and issue the best solutions in the shortest possible time. So, scientists managed to determine that these qualities of brain activity reach their maximum by the age of 25.

Neuroscientists from Sweden conducted a series of experiments in which more than 3 thousand subjects of various ages (from 9 to 90!) Participated. Researchers came to the conclusion that the results of the experiment clearly indicate that it is precisely 25-year-old people who are at the peak of their mental abilities and are able to solve the problems of any "behavioral complexity". Thus, the age correlated with the optimal complexity of behavior is 25 years.

This is what scientists from the Institute said about this in Stockholm: "After 25 years, the processing speed of information in neurons begins to decline, and people gradually" slide "to lower results, although this is not immediately noticeable. However, after 60 years you can observe a marked deterioration in cognitive functions and the emergence of difficulties in solving problems, not just such as crosswords and puzzles, but also everyday tasks. " In fairness, it should be noted that in this study, scientists did not evaluate the standard parameters of the cognitive sphere, such as the general level of intelligence and receptivity. Neurophysiologists were interested only in how effectively people are able to recognize the patterns presented to them. The authors of the work call them "algorithmic prerequisites for human behavior," emphasizing that such properties of brain activity have never been studied before.

Well, in any case, the daily practice of solving puzzles and puzzles can delay the aging of your brain for a long time, and this is also a proven fact!

And Semax to help you!

The brain is the organ that we think it is thinking

It is these provocative words of the famous American writer and journalist Birs Ambrose that can not be better portrayed the current situation in the world of science regarding the study of the brain. What is we, our mind and intuition?

What does the science of the brain say today?

The sensational discovery that the brain makes a decision 30 seconds before a person realizes this decision, once and for all destroyed the established system of our being. 30 seconds is a huge period of time for brain activity. Therefore, we can not firmly state that the decision belongs to us, we can not. Also, we can not say that the brain is us, because if we are guided by the latest discoveries, it controls us, and not us. This news was voiced in early 2016 by a Russian scientist in the field of neuroscience and psycholinguistics Tatyana Chernigovskaya.

Mechanisms of intuition

So what happens? We are not our body or our brain. But at the same time, it seems to us, we live in reality and are guided day by day by signals coming from the head. In doing so, we also distinguish these signals as the voice of reason and the voice of intuition.

Yes, the brain is cunning, not wishing to immediately reveal all its secrets, that's why a person receives information from him consciously, in a reasonable, logical way, and the other part - unconsciously, that is intuitively. What does this lead to? To the flashes of insight that suddenly overtake us. It seems to us that we for no apparent reason heard our inner voice, but in fact the brain gave us the information that had accumulated secretly from us long ago. After all, the table of chemical elements was not dreamed of by a baker or locksmith, but by a scientist who worked on this issue. It follows that intuition is not magic, but the ability of our clever head organ to gather information bit by bit, put it in the right box, and then - as a rule, this happens when we are either relaxed or very tense - giving everything away.

Intuition is the visible result of a long, "invisible", unconscious brain work. Goethe was very fond of repeating that thoughts should come to us as God's children and say: "Here we are!" But once again I want to emphasize the important thesis of scientists that ideas do not come without invitation, they need to "ache."

Intuition and prophetic dreams

Here is another interesting example of the mechanism of our intuition - the phenomenon of prophetic dreams. Do you know that our dreams are built from what was once fixed by the brain and what we have long forgotten? Or from what our brain caught, but did not let us realize? The psychologist Veronika Stepanova, reflecting on the question of intuition and prophetic dreams, once told the following example, which perfectly reveals this phenomenon. Once she dreamed of her husband's illness. Living abroad and being helpless in domestic matters, she asked her husband to help her understand domestic matters, telling him about a strange dream.

My husband was extremely surprised by this news. In his opinion, he had excellent health - like an astronaut. A week later the dream came true. Her husband Veronica had a heart attack. From the point of view of science, the phenomenon of this dream is perfectly understandable. How? At an unconscious level, Veronica began to notice that her husband's hands are swelling, the skin color becomes slightly earthy, a strange smell appears, and movements slow down. That is, in a dream the brain gave her those signals that she did not notice at the level of consciousness. It turns out that nothing supernatural happened. The brain showed what was needed. The brain cares for us, warns against danger. He is generally well done.

Where is the intuition?

Physiological studies show that it is the right hemisphere of the brain that is responsible for our "sixth sense". Psychologists say that intuition is everywhere and nowhere: this is an insensible phenomenon. As the world sees a person who has intuition developed, it is not clear, it is equally incomprehensible how people with developed logical thinking see the world. Because there is no entrance to someone else's head. As Tatyana Chernigovskaya says, if we take a conditional chicken, we pose in her brain electrodes or chicken the brain like a cabbage, we still will not see anything except the tissue. And no instrument will help, because the equipment is about the other. We can investigate neurons, but this too will not give us the opportunity to look at the world through the eyes of another person or through the eyes of the same chicken.

How to step over from neurons to Shakespeare, that is, to understand how a person perceives this world, where his intuition still resides, how a person can manifest his hidden abilities - all this is not yet known to us. But in spite of the fact that the question of intuition is little studied, we can still use it for the good of ourselves and others. The question arises - how?

How to start using intuition?

The ability to extract information hidden by the brain in the subconscious is the ability to use one's intuition. That is, creative inspiration, illumination, "eureka" can indeed be called. Everyone can learn this. It's enough just to relax. And it's not a joke. Our brain works on several levels: beta, alpha, theta, delta. As can be seen from the table below, the voice of intuition can be heard at the alpha and theta levels. For this it is necessary to fall into a state of light or deeper sleep. Now it is understandable why Salvador Dali sat in front of a clean canvas, holding a metal spoon in his hand over a plate. In an easy manner, he dropped it, the one clinked on the plate. The artist woke up, grabbed a brush and transferred to the canvas all the images seen in the meditative state.

To find a non-standard solution to their problems, today many successful businessmen, doctors, scientists use the meditation technique: Karl Simonton is a pioneer in cancer therapy, Cleve Baxter is a scientist, the founder of the theory of primary perception in plants, Steve Jobs, with the only one downloaded on the iPad The book "Autobiography of a Yogi," constantly engaged in meditations at work, and many others. Also, this method is used to lose weight, quit smoking, improve the learning achievement in school. And it really works! Our possibilities are great! So, the famous psychologist, hypnosis researcher Jose Silva, doing meditation with his children, was able to improve their perception of school material to such a level that even the youngest could understand and solve problems several classes higher without difficulties. Although 10 children did not please José with his good grades, they were absent-minded, and it seemed that their studies were never interested.

So, Tsiolkovsky, the father of Russian astronautics, was right that from the point of view of interplanetary communications the study of the human brain and psyche is more important than the development of space vehicles. What will happen to mankind when it learns to use all the information accumulated by this strange and cunning brain that has settled in the head? Perhaps even Luc Besson, who shot sensational sci-fi action "Lucy" in 2014, where the main role is performed by the beautiful Scarlett Johansson, did not fully reflect the possible changes!