Peptides or steroids? What is better?

Recently, the popularity of peptides has greatly increased. Every third athlete in the hall, at least once in his life, but tried peptides. Gradually, they begin to displace sports nutrition, and literally tread on the heels of anabolic steroids. And this is quite natural, in the continuation of the article we will tell why this happens. With the increasing popularity of peptides, they are increasingly compared with steroids, people ask questions, which is better in terms of effectiveness and safety for health, in this article we will try to convey to you information about the pros and cons of each of the "scourges" of gyms.

The price of a course of peptides and steroids?

The courses of peptides and steroids differ in a different set of preparations, and also duration. So experienced athletes need large doses to achieve progress than beginners. And also the time course for them should be more. But if you compare the most "budget" courses of peptides (GHRP solo) and steroids (methane solo), then the first option will be somewhat cheaper. But after methane, you need to do after the course therapy, and restore your body with other drugs. Therefore, we can conclude: the course of peptides is cheaper than the course of steroids.

Side effects of steroids and peptides?

To use steroids many are afraid because of side effects. The appearance of acne all over the body, the development of gynocomastia, increased emotional mood, sweating, stress on the liver and other organs, problems with sex life, all this is inherent in the course of steroids. Peptides, soft preparations, they will not harm the body. For all time, we heard only a few pobochek from because of them: drowsiness, short-term fever, sometimes because of the high dosage of melanotane there is a brief nausea. ALL. Conclusion: peptides without any problems circumvent steroids in terms of side effects. They are much safer and do not bring any health problems.

Growth of strength?

Unfortunately, peptides do not have as much effect on muscle fibers as steroids. They affect the muscle cells through the receptors, not penetrating inside. Anabolics, on the contrary, penetrate into the cell itself, stimulating it to transformations. Therefore, unfortunately, peptides can not be compared with steroids for the development of strength, the strengths are much slower.

What is the best mass? Peptides vs Steroids?

Again, everything here depends on the course, and the level of training of the athlete. But if we take as a basis two identical sportsmen and give one course GHRP 2, and the other a stack of methane, then both of them will gain an approximate equal amount of kg. However, after steroids, some of the mass will collapse, and from the peptides, practically remains in place. Both of these preparations will retain a certain amount of water, which will make the collected mass practically equivalent. But if you take a powerful AAS course for a set of dry meat, and a powerful course of peptides, then unfortunately the athlete on steroids will overtake the peptide guru. But this does not mean the superiority of one over the other. Let us repeat that the effect on steroids is temporary, after this course, during rest, a significant part of the recruited flies from the athlete (blown off like a ball), and he starts a new course, typing up his old kgs, and only then new ones. Conclusion: AAS is faster to gain dry muscle mass than peptides, but if you take for example the time interval - a year, and during this time to spend 3-4 cycles of steroids and peptides, the result will be approximately the same. We take into account possible health problems that may appear from AAS, and we announce a draw. It can not be said that with peptides, you can not collect as much meat as from steroids, you only need more time, as they say "quietly you go, you'll continue!"

Recovery abilities

Steroids are famous for that, in the shortest time possible to restore muscle after exhausting training. Thanks to this you can train at least every day, and do not feel tired. Peptides also accelerate the recovery of the body, although much inferior in this AAS. The strongest peptide in this regard is Ipamorelin. Thanks to it, the body quickly renews lost forces, and completely restores its energy losses. Conclusion: the unconditional victory of steroids.

Legality of peptides and steroids

The turnover of steroids is limited by the criminal law of the Russian Federation. When buying steroids, you can become an accomplice in a crime, because they are considered narcotic substances. Peptides are completely legal preparations. Their turnover is not controlled by law, and buying peptide bioregulators, you can in the online store without fear. The only, very many fakes, so we must carefully choose a seller who trades "working" products. Conclusion: Peptides are legal, so buying them is much easier, without any consequences.

The result. What to choose, peptides or steroids?

In this article, we examined in detail the pros and cons of two very popular drugs in the halls of our country. Pros of peptides - inexpensive price, absence of side effects, legality. The benefits of steroids are a faster set of muscle mass, better restorative abilities. Cons of peptides - in comparison with AAS it takes more time to achieve the result, you need a longer rest between training sessions. Disadvantages of steroids are illegal, there are many side effects, there may be health problems. Conclusion: if you work in the sports field, and the appearance is extremely important for you, since it can affect your salary, and you are ready to take risks - use steroids. If you are an ordinary visitor to a gym that does not compete in the competition, doing purely for yourself, which works until the evening, and then comes to the training, the peptides are for you. They will perfectly help to move you from the dead point, give impetus to further growth, and also to gain additional musculature. Therefore, everyone should decide for themselves, weighing all the pros and cons.